The Natural Bridge Zoo. Photo by Mark D. Robertson
The Natural Bridge Zoo. Photo by Mark D. Robertson

When veterinarians and law enforcement arrived at the Natural Bridge Zoo last month to execute a search warrant, they found fecal matter in food, untreated medical conditions and insufficient habitat for many of the 95 animals eventually seized in the raid, according to court testimony Tuesday.

Two of those veterinarians testified Tuesday at the Rockbridge County Courthouse in the continued animal neglect and mistreatment hearing against Karl and Debbie Mogensen, owners of the Natural Bridge Zoo. Tuesday afternoonโ€™s hearing consisted of the testimony of Ernesto Dominguez and Samantha Moffitt, who participated in the execution of the stateโ€™s search warrant against the zoo on Dec. 6 and 7. At that time, Virginia law enforcement, led by Christine Boczar, a Powhatan-based investigator, seized 95 animals from the zoo and euthanized a white Bengal tiger that officials deemed too ill to recover.

Most of the seized animals have been rehomed around the country at zoos and wildlife parks; the Cincinnati and Oakland zoos took a number of them, and The Roanoke Times reported over the weekend that an African elephant landed at Two Tails Ranch in Florida. Four giraffes recommended for seizure are still at the Natural Bridge Zoo; the hearing will determine the future for those animals. (Updated, Jan. 10 to correct number of giraffes.)

Dominguez, the lead veterinarian for the commonwealthโ€™s investigation, took the stand in the early afternoon for nearly three hours of testimony on the impoundings. Dominguez first recalled his reaction when he toured the zooโ€™s turtle and capuchin monkey facility.

โ€œThe first thing I noticed was โ€ฆ a really strong smell of urine and feces,โ€ Dominguez said, continuing to describe food spread on the ground among feces, ill-suited โ€œenrichmentโ€ in the enclosures, poor ventilation and inadequate water supplies for the animals.

The prosecution, led by senior associate attorney general Michelle Welch, then guided the court through the veterinarianโ€™s inspection that day โ€” exotic birds, lemurs, snakes and cats โ€” asking Dominguez to detail the manner in which he and his team of veterinarians examined and determined which of the zooโ€™s animals should be seized. They began early in the morning of Dec. 6, he said, before 8 a.m., and carried the examinations through until after dark, moving some of the animals into the zooโ€™s gift shop for warmth, before concluding the following day. Much of the day, Dominguez said, focused on providing veterinary care for the animals. For those that werenโ€™t seized, he testified, his team presented the zoo with action plans for their care.

After detailing each account of the seized animals, Welch asked Dominguez two questions.

โ€œDid you recommend seizure?โ€ Welch asked.

โ€œYes,โ€ Dominguez replied.

โ€œAnd were [the animals] being cruelly treated so as to be a direct and immediate threat to their health?โ€ the prosecution followed up.

โ€œYes,โ€ Dominguez said.

The Mogensensโ€™ attorney, Mario Williams, was not in the courtroom Tuesday. The hearingโ€™s second day was originally scheduled for Jan. 5, but Williams was ill, according to the Rockbridge County Sheriffโ€™s Office, necessitating the delay. Harrisonburg attorney Aaron Cook led the defense in Williamsโ€™ absence Tuesday.

Cook began by establishing the timeline on the first day the warrant was executed, Dec. 6, and continued to question Dominguez on the zoo staffโ€™s ability to care for the animals during the raid. He asked Dominguez about the staffโ€™s demeanor when they were involved with the animals.

โ€œThey seemed concerned about [the animalsโ€™] welfare, correct?โ€ he asked Dominguez, who answered that the staff did show concern and asked law enforcement for the ability to care for some of the more care-intensive animals, like exotic birds and cats.

Following Dominguezโ€™s testimony, the commonwealth called Moffitt, another veterinarian who took part in the investigation. Moffitt, an expert on agricultural animals, described a similar process to Dominguezโ€™s that resulted in recommendations for the seizure of sheep, donkeys, llamas and giraffes.

The hearing adjourned during cross-examination and will continue at 8:30 a.m. Wednesday.

Mark D. Robertson began writing for VirginiaPreps.com in 2006 and since has covered news and sports in...