The State Capitol. Photo by Bob Brown
The State Capitol. Photo by Bob Brown.

This has been updated Oct. 27, noon, with responses from candidates in House Districts 43 and 73.

As they prepare to assemble in Richmond on Monday for a hastily called special session, Democratic legislators are silent on their plans to pass a constitutional amendment that would allow for the General Assembly to draw congressional lines in time for the 2026 congressional midterms.

Cardinal News attempted to contact all 100 members of the House of Delegates and, where they have them, their opponents in this fall’s election, to ask their position on the proposed amendment. Not a single Democratic legislator replied, although some Democratic challengers did and indicated their support for the idea. Of the Republicans who replied, all were opposed.

Here’s who replied and what they said. If a district isn’t listed, it means neither the incumbent nor the challenger responded. To see how candidates stand on other issues, see our Voter Guide and look up your locality.

House District 7. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court
House District 7. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court.

District 7: Del. Karen Keys-Gamarra, D-Fairfax County, vs. Republican Cass Aucoin

Keys-Gamarra (D): No response.

Aucoin (R): “Oppose.”

House District 11. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court
House District 11. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court.

District 11: Del. David Bulova, D-Fairfax County, vs. Republican Adam Wise vs. Forward Party candidate Brandon Givens

Bulova (D): No response.

Wise (R): “I would want to know the reason for the proposed changes before I made a decision.”

Givens (Forward): No response.

House District 13. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court
House District 13. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court

District 13: Del. Marcus Simon, D-Fairfax County, vs. Republican Sylwia Oleksy vs. Libertarian Dave Crance

Simon (D): No response.

Oleksy (R): No response.

Crance (Libertarian): “No. Article 12 section 1 of the Virginia constitution states such a measure must be passed before the next House of Delegates general election then passed again in a session after that election to go to the ballot. 

“Being as the current general election for the House of Delegates elections began the moment the first ballot was cast the earliest they should be able to bring the second vote should be after the next general election in 2027. Anything earlier disenfranchises the thousands of voters who already cast their ballots and invalidates the purpose/intent of that section. 

“It seems pretty obvious the wording is meant to give the voters an opportunity to replace their delegates in an election if they are unhappy with their position on a proposed amendment. I am fine if they run it for the 2028 session as the constitution states it should be — that’s honors the will of voters.”

House District 32. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court
House District 32. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court.

District 32: Del. Bill Wiley, R-Frederick County, vs. Democrat Jon Michael Lucci

Lucci (D): No response.

Wiley (R): “Oppose.”

House District 34. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court.
House District 34. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court.

District 34: Del. Tony Wilt, R-Rockingham County, vs. Democrat Andrew Payton

Payton (D): “With less than two weeks left, I am very focused on the election right now!”

Wilt (R): “Just a few years ago, both parties agreed to a transparent process that produced fair and reasonable maps by many independent accounts. Neither party was completely satisfied by the outcome, which likely means it was fair. Virginia voters overwhelmingly approved this process through the ballot initiative, by 65.7%. Now, Democrats are prepared to renege on that agreement in pursuit of their own political advantage, following the marching orders of Washington Democrats who continue to hold our federal government hostage … Virginians should be clear-eyed: this isn’t about serving the people; it’s about protecting and increasing the power of the Democratic Party. If they proceed, this is a partisan power grab, plain and simple.”

House District 35. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court.
House District 35. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court.

District 35: Del. Chris Runion, R-Rockingham County, vs. Democrat Jena Crisler

Crisler (D): No response.

Runion (R): “I am adamantly opposed to this blatant political stunt. It flies in the face of the citizens of Virginia who overwhelmingly decided this issue. So disappointing to see such a reckless disregard for the fundamental right of citizens to pick their own representatives.”

House District 39. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court.
House District 39. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court.

District 39: Del. Will Davis, R-Franklin County, vs. Democrat Eric Klotz

Klotz (D): “I support Virginia’s special session to redistrict because voters should choose their representatives, not the other way around. Fair maps mean fair elections and a stronger democracy!”

Davis (R): No response.

House District 40. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court.
House District 40. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court.

District 40: Del. Joe McNamara, R-Roanoke County, vs. Democrat Donna Littlepage

Littlepage (D): “I was a staunch supporter of Virginia 2021 for many years. A bipartisan commission truly resonated with me because it felt like it brought more fairness to a system that seems rigged by those in power much of the time. And for that same reason, I find the initial efforts of Republican led states to rig the system for the upcoming mid-term elections, completely inappropriate. Now here we are with the question of what should Democratic led states do, if anything. I completely understand the desire to do something because actions from Washington are having dramatic impacts on Virginia. I have been consistent in my position that when voters have the opportunity to decide an issue, they should be given that opportunity. So once again, I am in support of letting voters decide and when that occurs, I will have one vote like everyone else. I am hopeful that if voters feel we need to take action during these unprecedented times, they will also include a plan for the bipartisan commission to resume its role in the future.”

McNamara (R): “100% opposed.”

House District 41 covers parts of Montgomery and Roanoke counties. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court.
House District 41. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court.

District 41: Del. Chris Obenshain, R-Montgomery County, vs. Democrat Lily Franklin

Franklin (D): No response.

Obenshain (R): “The Constitutional amendment establishing a bipartisan redistricting commission was overwhelmingly passed by voters in 2020. This initiative garnered support across the political spectrum, including Independents, Unaffiliated voters, Democrats, and Republicans, all of whom believed it would lead to better politics in Virginia.

“I voted for and supported that amendment. It has succeeded in delivering fairer districts than the old process that let politicians choose their constituents. I will oppose any effort to overturn the will of Virginia voters by eliminating the redistricting commission.

“It is clear that the voters have spoken on this issue, and the political gamesmanship being exerted is both wrong and unjust. Virginia has a history of leading, not following, when it comes to such matters.”

House District 42. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court.
House District 42. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court.

District 42: Del. Jason Ballard, R-Giles County, vs. Democrat Biko Agozino

Agozino (D): No response.

Ballard (R): “I oppose the Democrats’ efforts to undo the constitutional amendment that 4 million Virginians supported that enacted a non-partisan redistricting process for our state.”

House District 43. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court.

District 43: Del. Will Morefield, R-Tazewell County vs. Democrat Mary Sumner

Sumner (D): “I would be in favor of the allowing the new Redistricting maps in time for the 2926 elections.”

Morefield (R): No response.

House District 44. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court.

District 44: Del. Israel O’Quinn, R-Washington County vs. Democrat Cindy Green

Green (D): No response.

O’Quinn (R): “Oppose amending the state constitution as well as the proposed process.”

House District 46. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court.
House District 46. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court.

District 46: Republican Mitchell Cornett vs. Democrat Jamie Hendry for an open seat

Hendry (D): No response.

Cornett (R): “I am strongly opposed. The voters of the Commonwealth overwhelmingly voted to allow a bipartisan commission for redistricting in 2020. This move would disenfranchise voters and would be bad for Virginia.”

House District 48. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court.
House District 48. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court.

District 48: Del. Eric Phillips, R-Henry County, vs. Democrat Melody Cartwright

Cartwright (D): “100% in agreement with the amendment. The reason why I am running today is due to the obvious gerrymandering perpetrated on our District 48 and why no other Democrat had the courage or will to step up. We used to be a Blue district prior to redistricting. Out went Delegate Ward Armstrong and Senator Roscoe Reynolds. If Texas can do it, so can Virginia. If states should be in power, then so be it! We must stand up and fight now, or never!”

Phillips (R): No response.

House District 72. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court.
House District 72. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court.

District 72: Del. Lee Ware, R-Powhatan County, vs. Democrat Randolph Critzer vs. Forward Party candidate Kristin Farry

Critzer (D): No response.

Ware (R): “Oppose, of course, owing to the implied repeal of the bipartisan redistricting commission.”

Farry (Forward): “I oppose this and all other state-level gerrymandering efforts across the nation that are stripping individual voters of their voice. I am equally opposed to gerrymandering efforts by both Democrats and Republicans. We the People of Virginia fought hard for Amendment 1, which reduced the gerrymandering just a few years ago, and I will oppose any effort to roll back this progress.  We need to strengthen Amendment 1 to get more truly competitive districts, not throw this progress away.

“My party — the Forward Party — origins are in electoral reform movements to restore the power to the people. The U.S. Constitution entrusts states with running federal elections for very good reasons. We should not allow any federal officials to order Virginia to reduce our rights, whether we agree with the near-term outcome of that effort or not.”

House District 73 covers part of Chesterfield County. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court.
House District 73 covers part of Chesterfield County. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court.

District 73 Del. Mark Earley Jr., R-Chesterfield County, vs. Democrat Leslie Mehta

Mehta (D): No response.

Earley (R): “I oppose amending the state constitution to allow for new congressional district maps in time for the 2026 election. The voters of VA overwhelmingly approved a nonpartisan commission to handle redistricting — in my Chesterfield district, over 70% of people voted for this.  The Democrat leadership is calling an unprecedented special session for the explicitly purpose of extreme gerrymandering.  They’re also looking to take many of us off the campaign trail the last week before a huge election.  I oppose gerrymandering and stand with the over 70% of my people that oppose gerrymandering.”

House District 74. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court.
House District 74. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court.

District 74: Del. Mike Cherry, R-Colonial Heights, vs. Democrat Jonas Eppert

Eppert (D): “Jonas is in favor of the amendment you asked about.”

Cherry (R): “Absolutely oppose.”

House District 97. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court.
House District 97. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court.

District 97: Del. Michael Feggans, D-Virginia Beach, vs. Republican Tim Anderson

Feggans (D): No response.

Anderson (R): “In light of next week’s special session, this entire redistricting push is political hypocrisy on full display. Democrats didn’t start demanding a special session until after their party’s redistricting PAC dropped $300,000 into Virginia races. That’s blatant quid pro quo politics while families of federal workers are struggling to pay bills during the Democrat-caused shutdown in Washington.

“These are the same Democrats who condemned Donald Trump and Republican legislatures for trying to manipulate maps in states like Texas and North Carolina. Nearly four million Virginians voted to create a bipartisan redistricting commission precisely to stop this kind of nonsense. Voters demanded fairness — not political revenge.

“I strongly oppose repealing the bipartisan redistricting process and redrawing congressional maps simply to satisfy a partisan power grab. Virginia deserves consistency, not a return to back-room machine politics.”

House District 100. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court.
House District 100. Courtesy of Virginia Supreme Court.

District 100: Del. Rob Bloxom, R-Accomack County, vs. Democrat Liz Richardson

Richardson (D): No response.

Bloxom (R): “No the voters overwhelmingly told us that they didn’t want politicians picking their voters. I’m not sure how procedurally this can even be considered.”